Social Bookmarking and Power Linking

by User Imageandrew · 12 comments

Social Bookmarking and Power Linking.

Just in case you missed it… the Web has changed.

I think a little history of the Internet is in order to grasp the big picture. I’m not going to give any dates (late eighties and early 90’s)… I’ll just give a quick run down.

I would say nearly fifteen years ago I had a dial up Internet connection that allowed me to log into various College computers, BBS’s (bulletin boards) and Newsgroups.

The Internet was much different than the Web is today. There was no graphics… it was totally text based and everything was dial up. All you could do was basically post to a newsgroup, post messages on some BBS’s and send email. Internet Marketing as we know it today did not exist.

In time though – a few brave souls ventured out of the shadows and began marketing within the newsgroups. This started wars between the “Purists” and new “Marketers” that I still remember to this day.

You see, the Purists considered the Internet to be their own little playground. They viewed anyone selling something as evil. After all… Marketers had the TV, the Radio, Magazines, Newspapers, etc, etc as an avenue in which to sell their crap. “The Internet is ours” was their battle cry.

They viewed the Internet as a way for them to communicate with each other without having to wade through all the BS advertising – and they could control what was being said. When the evil “Marketer” entered the picture, this all changed – and it changed quickly.

Once the evil Marketer had discovered the Internet as a new marketing medium, the “Purity” of the Internet, newsgroups and BBS’s was destroyed forever.

The Internet was now becoming just another medium for Marketers to sell their wares. It was inevitable and only a matter of time before this happened. But the Purists fought it tooth and nail.

The Newsgroups and BBS’s were now inundated and overrun with advertising. There was so much spam that you could hardly follow a thread or make sense of it. The thread may have started out discussing a subject as “Microsoft DOS” as it’s first post… but it was hard to make sense of it as the evil Marketers would post “off topic” spam ads trying to sell their wares throughout the threads.

As we all know things have changed a lot since those “Caveman” days… the evil Marketers persevered and the Purists lost the War (or did they?)

Jump to present day…

The Purists did not really lose – they just lost a battle ten or fifteen years ago, but they have recently won the War and staked their claim on the Internet as belonging to them with Web 2.0.

Just in case you missed this “coup d’ etat” – give some serious thought to the current environment on the Web and Social Networking specifically. The Web no longer belongs to the evil Marketer. It is back in the hands and control of the Purists and they are once again controlling the conversations.

I know… it sounds like a bunch of BS, but for the most part it is true.

The difference is the Purists have discovered a way to once again “control” the conversations they want to have, while at the same time make a profit from these discussions (i.e. social networking communities).

Welcome to Web 2.0 and Social Networking.

I do not consider myself a Internet “Purist”… I’d fall more into the “Evil Marketer” category. This being the case, like you (if you are an Evil Marketer too) I have to adapt and change the way I do things or I will soon fall to the wayside and die a slow death.

Like the saying goes, “When in Rome… do as The Romans Do” was never a truer statement than it is today.

The way you sell things and market has to change – you are now in Rome.

Marketing as we know it today on the Web is dying a slow death – but it is happening fast. Only those who adapt and change will survive.

The Web 2.0 Marketer will survive this “coup d’ etat”.

Interruption Marketing has lost out to Participation Marketing and the Web 2.0 Marketer will prosper with these changes. It is no longer about forcing our messages down the throats of people – they get enough of that with all the other advertising mediums. It is all about authority, conversations and participating within discussions that other people deem important – not what you feel is important.

Seth Godin has been telling us this very same thing for a few years now – but a lot have not listened.

Why is this? Because it takes work and discipline (and change) to make relationships and participate in meaningful conversations. It is easier to do what I would call “method of the day” or “hit and miss” marketing – at least in the short run. But that is all it is… marketing for the short haul with no regard to the direction the Web is moving.

Like Seth Godin, Jack Humphrey has been telling Marketers they need to adapt and change their marketing methods for years now with Social Power Linking. Jack saw this “coup d’ etat” coming before most and began joining in with the “conversations” while most of us were still doing our marketing basically the same way as the “evil Marketers” of past (and current) – cramming and forcing our message down our visitors throats.

I have posted before on Social Bookmarking and Social Networking and the success I have had with these methods. You can view other posts on this blog and see the results I have had by simply joining in and creating “conversations”.

This is not a fad or a “method of the day”… it is here to stay.

With the direction the Web is heading (we are really already there) – Social Bookmarking, Social Networking, Conversation Participation with links from and pointing to those conversations is the key to being successful for the Web 2.0 Marketer.

So don’t rebel against the “coup d’ etat” – come on it, the water is fine.

Audio Version (Podcast) of this post:

 
icon for podpress  Social Bookmarking and Power Linking [7:52m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Rate this:
3.7

{ 2 trackbacks }

Anonymous
12.23.07 at 10:33 am
Podcasting Hosts and Directories
12.25.07 at 8:38 pm

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Fred Davis 12.21.07 at 5:31 pm

Great Reading Andrew. Now to change my nasty habits and learn this web 2 marketing way. Fred

2 Bill Platt 12.21.07 at 11:02 pm

Your argument about the purists versus the evil marketer seems an appropriate analogy. I also remember those dark days in the caveman world, although I was in a bit later than you. I came in with Netscape 1.0.

The mid ground between the purist and evil marketer seems to have been information marketing, where one teaches a reader and due to that lesson, they get a chance to be the evil marketer in the end.

Even Web 2.0 seems to support this methodology, as you can either piss off a bunch a people and get linked because of it, or you can teach something valuable and get a number of links, although not as many as you could have if you pissed off the masses. ;-)

3 Sabrina 12.21.07 at 11:39 pm

If I get what Bill is saying, the Evil Marketer basically taught the Purists the tricks of the trade and now the Purists have taken back control.

I’m not to sure I buy into the Purists taking back control with Social Networking, as that seems to be a bit conspiratorial.

On the other hand, I guess you could label it as what goes around comes around.

4 Bill Platt 12.22.07 at 2:30 am

Sorry. Sometimes I ramble and miss my own point.

I was thinking that some people have found a way to walk the line between the two camps. I wrote an article one time about motorcycles for a client and it got published on a biker website.

People read the article and seemed to have liked it. Then the comments came. One guy said that is was a great article and he was really getting into the message, then he saw the ad for the lawyer. His words were, “damn ambulance chasers.” ;-)

In the land of the purists, the marketer was loved until the marketing message came. The purists were carried through the information with great interest, then they realized that the message came from a marketer.

Social bookmarking was designed as a way for individuals to advertise their interests from a purist standpoint, but they in effect help the marketers in their quest by giving thousands of links to people who piss them off, and they may yet give a few links to the people who simply teach them something of value.

I believe in conspiracies at a small scale, but not at a large one.

“The Worst President In History” was an example of a small conspiracy by a few bloggers to trash George Bush. It worked for a while. There is even a Ron Paul conspiracy going on right now, with a few more players on the Internet. ;-)

I remember just a few months ago, Ron Paul was netting about 2% of the vote, but in the college town where I live, there are always dozens of hand made signs hanging on street signs at every major intersection in town. The conspiracy here is a bunch of college kids trying to push Ron Paul, and they are succeeding online and offline, as Paul seems to be getting quite a bit more “financial” support anyway. But, I digress.

Bill

5 Andrew 12.23.07 at 11:36 am

netnow1.gif  It is funny how the second Money enters the picture, people throw up their guard. Guess you really can’t blame them.

I think that is why Social Networking and Bookmarking will help those Marketers who are providing solid content and participating in the conversations.

Using your example on the Motorcycle article Bill – the one reader seemed to enjoy the article when "in his mind" there was not a monetary reason for posting it. But the minute they saw the ad, their perception of the Article seemed to change – as you stated.

I think a lot of people take it a bit to far. They cannot be so narrow minded to believe that everything can and will be free. Somebody (everybody) has to pay the bills.

A lot of this "Purist" mindset reminds me of the line in the movie "Let It Ride" when Teri Garr – who is pissed off at her husband (Richard Dreyfuss) for gambling says, "Can’t you people come to the horse races and watch the races without betting?" (not exact quote – close as I can remember). She didn’t get it either – no betting, no horse races.

Anyway, thanks for the great comments.

6 Larry 01.07.08 at 9:15 am

Great article Andrew, and so true!

However, thanks to Verizon we’re still on dialup. They refuse to give us DSL in our “remote” location, while people in neighboring towns have it. Not only are we forced to use dialup, but Verizon split our line with someone else so our 56K modem only runs at 24K while connected (of course, they didn’t split our bills, we both still pay full price).

So, you can imagine how I felt when you mentioned the ancient days of dialup. Now, imagine trying to run our website from a dialup connection! Thanks a lot Verizon!

7 One Happy Gift 01.10.08 at 6:48 pm

Great article and lol do as the Romans do. We interrupt this broadcast to pay the bills.

8 Andrew 01.12.08 at 10:49 pm

I feel for you Larry. I do not know how you surf this image heavy web on a dialup.

Andrew

9 Tom Lindstrom 03.18.08 at 1:14 pm

Excellent article!

Tom Lindstrom’s last blog post..Thinking Of Selling Your Home Business

10 alex farguson 03.08.09 at 1:55 am

I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the good work. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.

Previous post: Free Blog Platforms, Networks and Communities

Next post: Best of Copyblogger

games dora free.